header links

___________________________For all Delta people who have truly touched the High Life!__________________________________
PCN Web Site____PCN FORUM___PCN Ads_____ About______ Calendar______ G-Group______ Links______ Sign Up______ FAQ______ Archives______ Contact ______________________High Life Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adw772km7PQ&ob=av2e

Latest High Life Issue

Latest HL 364 published Oct 21, 2024. Not all sections of Blog are on first page. Click OLDER POSTS to view additional newsletter sections. For PDF version and all archived list CLICK HERE. Look for next issue soon!

Airlines news

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Misc _ HL 142 (2)


ALPA’s Response to organizing efforts of the alternate union DPA: (As you know that but one of the bullet points for the DPA organizing effort is the potential “liability” ALPA will have over the TWA litigation).

12-08
September 28, 2012

 

Rumor Control: Brady v. ALPA Update

In Touch & Gos 12-01, published last January, we provided you with an update on the lawsuit known as Brady v. ALPA or as it is often referred to, the TWA pilots’ lawsuit.

As a review, when American purchased TWA’s assets, the TWA MEC was very supportive of the transaction because it meant good jobs at a then strong carrier for the TWA pilots. As part of the process, the TWA MEC voted to waive the pilots’ contractual right to seniority arbitration; they agreed to this waiver because it was demanded by American management as a condition for going forward with the transaction.

Later, after the seniority lists were integrated and a portion of the TWA pilots were “stapled” to the bottom of the list, a group of former TWA pilots (now American pilots), including former MEC members, alleged that the waiver decision was somehow forced upon them by ALPA and that ALPA was motivated by a desire to bring the American Airlines pilots into ALPA. That’s not what happened, and ALPA has argued that there is no evidence to support this bizarre claim. Instead, ALPA’s advice and actions were geared toward supporting the MEC’s own decisions.

It is not at all unusual for cases like this to take many years to resolve. This case was initially filed a decade ago. After lengthy delays for a variety of reasons, the lawsuit finally went to trial in June of 2011 and a verdict was issued on July 13, 2011. This case is bifurcated, which means that while there has been a jury verdict on liability, there has not yet been any determination of damages.

On July 31, 2012, the judge in the case denied ALPA’s motion for permission to appeal before further discovery or trial on damages occurs. This was not unexpected. District judges don’t like to permit intermediate appeals based upon their own alleged mistakes and rarely do they do so. ALPA believes that the judge made several statements during the July 31 hearing concerning the legal standards that are simply wrong and that conflict directly with the applicable law and Supreme Court precedent. Others are using those statements as convenient “sound bites” to mischaracterize ALPA’s legal obligations. ALPA is confident that the law, properly applied, will establish that ALPA did not breach its legal obligations.

During the July 31 hearing, the judge also directed the plaintiffs to produce by no later than September 28, 2012 their expert report(s) showing at least what they believe the seniority integration would have looked like but for ALPA’s alleged breach of its duty of fair representation. If the plaintiffs meet this deadline, they will finally have to describe for the very first time their theory of damages – including which pilots were legally harmed, how they calculate their damages, and how much they think they should get from our union.

As part of this “theory of damages” report, we can expect a substantial but fancifully absurd dream list, which will likely include:

· An extraordinarily large number of pilots the plaintiffs intend to try to prove actually were harmed,

· A proposed seniority list reflecting the plaintiffs’ “fantasy integration” based on their theory that ALPA should have done more to get the American pilots to give up their seniority rights; this list will likely rely on an unsupported and unrealistic view of what “might have been if only . . .”,

· An equally unrealistic and astronomically high damages number; we should expect that the plaintiffs and others will make the most of the opportunity to circulate for effect this wildly inflated damages number.

Despite these anticipated tactics, bear in mind that the judge has clearly warned the plaintiffs they will have a very tough road ahead in trying to prove any damages at all.

During the damages phase, ALPA will have the opportunity to discredit and disprove these claims with evidence from our own experts and other witnesses. It is not at all unusual in these types of cases for a party to retain outside legal counsel that specializes in damage litigation, and ALPA has done just that. ALPA has retained the services of three attorneys from the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison. All three are highly regarded trial attorneys with extensive experience and expertise in defending against damages claims. They will work closely with members of ALPA’s existing legal team.

Note that a trial date for the damages phase has not yet even been set. A status conference is scheduled to be held on October 2 at which the judge is expected to establish additional deadlines for discovery that likely will include when ALPA must submit its responding expert reports.

As we reported in Touch & Gos 12-01, there have been rumors and wild but unsupported speculation that the awarded damages will be very large, requiring an assessment of the ALPA membership. There is no basis for this assertion. Further, ALPA has never assessed its membership to pay for litigation, awards, verdicts or settlements, and no such assessment is being considered. But to add to what we wrote in Touch & Gos 12-01, you should understand that under ALPA’s Constitution and By-Laws, an assessment of the membership can be adopted:

· Only by a majority vote of the Board of Directors or the Executive Board and then

· Only by a majority vote of the active members in good standing, i.e. ALPA’s line pilots

Don’t allow yourself to react to or be influenced by rumors, speculation, and misinformation that you may encounter on the line. ALPA will continue to use every resource at its disposal in defense of this case, and we will keep you updated with facts as the case goes forward.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Editor: Here is a summary of the AA imposed contract that is now causing all the slowdown reaction by flying pilots.

This came out on the 14th.

Notice the newslink which follows as of today....

Here's what APA put out to their membership today...

Management's Overreach
We now know the extent of management's overreaching as they have rejected our contract and imposed the most onerous 1113 terms.
Going forward, here is what you can expect (not a complete list):

  • Provide ZERO pension contributions: A Plan frozen. B Plan terminated and you will not be provided with any form of replacement company contribution pension plan. That's right, ZERO. Not 11%, ZERO.
  • Duty Rig Decimation: G time – eliminate minimum day, average day = 4:15 vs. Historic 5.0, E time eliminated, F time reduced and only starts after 29 hour layover.
  • No new furlough protection.
  • Unlimited large RJs at commuter carriers
  • Massive codeshare with domestic carriers, well in excess of industry standard.
  • Per sequence, all over-fly time will be reduced by any under-fly time occurring in the sequence.
  • Night pay eliminated.
  • Below industry standard pay banding, (e.g.. A319).
  • No pay increases, locks in AA pilot pay well below industry standard and inflation indefinitely. Pay reductions when lost night pay and international pay are accounted for.
  • No path to industry standard pay rates.
  • Lines scheduled up to 87 hours.
  • Reassignments to FARs.
  • Flight time and duty time to FARs.
  • Eliminate international pay for Caribbean, Hawaii and Mexico.
  • Significantly increased medical premiums and co-pays.
  • Elimination of company paid retiree medical.
  • Significant reductions to the Long-Term Disability Plan.

Management's 1113 court testimony confirmed that prior to bankruptcy, they were engaged in a "kick the can" negotiations strategy. Now they've moved to "kick the hornets' nest."
If you're looking for motivation to be involved, we suggest you review the list above. Add up the reduction in total take home compensation, the extra days away from home and family, the captain and first officer job losses due to scope and work rule changes ― then reconsider your involvement level.
As we move forward, there will be APA events scheduled requiring your participation and commitment. It's time to be involved.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/canceled-flights-surge-american-airlines-000704361.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Full post disclaimer in left column. PCN Home Page is located at: http://pcn.homestead.com/home01.html

No comments: