ALPA’s Response to organizing efforts of the alternate union DPA: (As
you know that but one of the bullet points for the DPA organizing effort is the
potential “liability” ALPA will have over the TWA litigation).
12-08
|
September 28, 2012
|
Rumor
Control: Brady v. ALPA Update
In Touch & Gos 12-01, published
last January, we provided you with an update on the lawsuit known as Brady
v. ALPA or as it is often referred to, the TWA pilots’ lawsuit.
As a review, when American purchased
TWA’s assets, the TWA MEC was very supportive of the transaction because it
meant good jobs at a then strong carrier for the TWA pilots. As part of the
process, the TWA MEC voted to waive the pilots’ contractual right to seniority
arbitration; they agreed to this waiver because it was demanded by American
management as a condition for going forward with the transaction.
Later, after the seniority lists
were integrated and a portion of the TWA pilots were “stapled” to the bottom of
the list, a group of former TWA pilots (now American pilots), including former
MEC members, alleged that the waiver decision was somehow forced upon them by
ALPA and that ALPA was motivated by a desire to bring the American Airlines
pilots into ALPA. That’s not what happened, and ALPA has argued that there is
no evidence to support this bizarre claim. Instead, ALPA’s advice and actions
were geared toward supporting the MEC’s own decisions.
It is not at all unusual for cases
like this to take many years to resolve. This case was initially filed a decade
ago. After lengthy delays for a variety of reasons, the lawsuit finally went to
trial in June of 2011 and a verdict was issued on July 13, 2011. This case is bifurcated,
which means that while there has been a jury verdict on liability, there has
not yet been any determination of damages.
On July 31, 2012, the judge in the
case denied ALPA’s motion for permission to appeal before further discovery or
trial on damages occurs. This was not unexpected. District judges don’t like to
permit intermediate appeals based upon their own alleged mistakes and rarely do
they do so. ALPA believes that the judge made several statements during the
July 31 hearing concerning the legal standards that are simply wrong and that
conflict directly with the applicable law and Supreme Court precedent. Others
are using those statements as convenient “sound bites” to mischaracterize
ALPA’s legal obligations. ALPA is confident that the law, properly applied,
will establish that ALPA did not breach its legal obligations.
During the July 31 hearing, the
judge also directed the plaintiffs to produce by no later than September 28,
2012 their expert report(s) showing at least what they believe the
seniority integration would have looked like but for ALPA’s alleged breach of
its duty of fair representation. If the plaintiffs meet this deadline, they
will finally have to describe for the very first time
their theory of damages – including which pilots were legally harmed, how they
calculate their damages, and how much they think they should get from our
union.
As part of this “theory of damages”
report, we can expect a substantial but fancifully absurd dream list, which
will likely include:
· An extraordinarily large number of
pilots the plaintiffs intend to try to prove actually were harmed,
· A proposed seniority list reflecting
the plaintiffs’ “fantasy integration” based on their theory that ALPA should
have done more to get the American pilots to give up their seniority rights;
this list will likely rely on an unsupported and unrealistic view of what
“might have been if only . . .”,
· An equally unrealistic and
astronomically high damages number; we should expect that the plaintiffs and
others will make the most of the opportunity to circulate for effect this
wildly inflated damages number.
Despite these anticipated tactics,
bear in mind that the judge has clearly warned the plaintiffs they will have a
very tough road ahead in trying to prove any damages at all.
During the damages phase, ALPA will
have the opportunity to discredit and disprove these claims with evidence from
our own experts and other witnesses. It is not at all unusual in these types of
cases for a party to retain outside legal counsel that specializes in damage
litigation, and ALPA has done just that. ALPA has retained the services of
three attorneys from the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and
Garrison. All three are highly regarded trial attorneys with extensive
experience and expertise in defending against damages claims. They will work
closely with members of ALPA’s existing legal team.
Note that a trial date for the
damages phase has not yet even been set. A status conference is
scheduled to be held on October 2 at which the judge is expected to establish
additional deadlines for discovery that likely will include when ALPA must
submit its responding expert reports.
As we reported in Touch & Gos
12-01, there have been rumors and wild but unsupported speculation that the
awarded damages will be very large, requiring an assessment of the ALPA
membership. There is no basis for this assertion. Further, ALPA has never
assessed its membership to pay for litigation, awards, verdicts or settlements,
and no such assessment is being considered. But to add to what we wrote in Touch
& Gos 12-01, you should understand that under ALPA’s Constitution and
By-Laws, an assessment of the membership can be adopted:
· Only by a majority vote of the Board of Directors or the
Executive Board and then
· Only by a majority vote of the active members in good standing,
i.e. ALPA’s line pilots
Don’t allow yourself to react to or
be influenced by rumors, speculation, and misinformation that you may encounter
on the line. ALPA will continue to use every resource at its disposal in
defense of this case, and we will keep you updated with facts as the
case goes forward.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Editor: Here is a summary of the AA imposed contract that is
now causing all the slowdown reaction by flying pilots.
This came
out on the 14th.
Notice the newslink which follows as of today....
Here's what APA put out to their membership today...
Management's Overreach
We now know the extent of management's overreaching as they have rejected our contract and imposed the most onerous 1113 terms.
Going forward, here is what you can expect (not a complete list):
Notice the newslink which follows as of today....
Here's what APA put out to their membership today...
Management's Overreach
We now know the extent of management's overreaching as they have rejected our contract and imposed the most onerous 1113 terms.
Going forward, here is what you can expect (not a complete list):
- Provide ZERO pension contributions: A Plan frozen. B Plan terminated and you will not be provided with any form of replacement company contribution pension plan. That's right, ZERO. Not 11%, ZERO.
- Duty Rig Decimation: G time – eliminate minimum day, average day = 4:15 vs. Historic 5.0, E time eliminated, F time reduced and only starts after 29 hour layover.
- No new furlough protection.
- Unlimited large RJs at commuter carriers
- Massive codeshare with domestic carriers, well in excess of industry standard.
- Per sequence, all over-fly time will be reduced by any under-fly time occurring in the sequence.
- Night pay eliminated.
- Below industry standard pay banding, (e.g.. A319).
- No pay increases, locks in AA pilot pay well below industry standard and inflation indefinitely. Pay reductions when lost night pay and international pay are accounted for.
- No path to industry standard pay rates.
- Lines scheduled up to 87 hours.
- Reassignments to FARs.
- Flight time and duty time to FARs.
- Eliminate international pay for Caribbean, Hawaii and Mexico.
- Significantly increased medical premiums and co-pays.
- Elimination of company paid retiree medical.
- Significant reductions to the Long-Term Disability Plan.
Management's 1113 court testimony confirmed that prior to
bankruptcy, they were engaged in a "kick the can" negotiations
strategy. Now they've moved to "kick the hornets' nest."
If you're looking for motivation to be involved, we suggest you review the list above. Add up the reduction in total take home compensation, the extra days away from home and family, the captain and first officer job losses due to scope and work rule changes ― then reconsider your involvement level.
As we move forward, there will be APA events scheduled requiring your participation and commitment. It's time to be involved.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/canceled-flights-surge-american-airlines-000704361.html
If you're looking for motivation to be involved, we suggest you review the list above. Add up the reduction in total take home compensation, the extra days away from home and family, the captain and first officer job losses due to scope and work rule changes ― then reconsider your involvement level.
As we move forward, there will be APA events scheduled requiring your participation and commitment. It's time to be involved.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/canceled-flights-surge-american-airlines-000704361.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Full post disclaimer in left column. PCN Home Page is located at: http://pcn.homestead.com/home01.html
No comments:
Post a Comment